ThreatKey vs. Wiz

Loved by leading security teams around the world.


Cybersecurity is crucial for organizations to protect their data and systems against evolving threats. Two companies offering security solutions are ThreatKey and Wiz. Both identify and remediate vulnerabilities in cloud environments.

This article compares ThreatKey and Wiz in-depth, analyzing their features, customers, strengths and weaknesses. Understanding the key differences between these two platforms can help organizations select the one that best fits their needs.

Overview of ThreatKey

ThreatKey, founded in 2020 and headquartered in San Francisco, offers security posture management to secure SaaS applications and cloud infrastructure. It finds misconfigurations and prioritizes remediation based on vulnerability data.

Key ThreatKey capabilities:

  • SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) - Scans SaaS apps to uncover risks.
  • Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) - Assesses cloud resources against best practices.
  • Prioritized Remediation - Analyzes and prioritizes findings by risk.
  • Compliance Assistance - Continuously audits SaaS apps for compliance.
  • Intuitive Interface - Easy to use with fast time to value.

ThreatKey suits organizations of all sizes to improve SaaS and cloud security. It charges based on users and apps secured.

Overview of Wiz

Wiz, founded in 2020 and headquartered in New York City, is a cloud security platform that discovers vulnerabilities and misconfigurations in cloud environments. It provides prioritized remediation based on risk severity.

Key capabilities of Wiz include:

  • Cloud Infrastructure Security - Continuously assesses cloud resources for risks.
  • Identity and Access Management - Analyzes permissions and proposes least privilege access.
  • Vulnerability Scanner - Scans infrastructure, containers, code repositories, and more for flaws.
  • Compliance Frameworks - Identifies deviations from regulations like PCI DSS, ISO 27001.
  • Centralized Dashboard - Unified view with risk-based findings and remediation tracking.

Wiz offers comprehensive cloud security tailored for enterprises. It charges based on assets monitored.

Comparing Core Capabilities

While both platforms strengthen cloud security, ThreatKey and Wiz differ in focus:

  • Scope - ThreatKey covers SaaS apps and cloud infrastructure. Wiz focuses just on infrastructure.
  • Approach - ThreatKey is posture management. Wiz provides broader vulnerability assessment.
  • Remediation - ThreatKey has basic remediation rankings. Wiz enables automated remediation workflows.
  • Compliance - Both check configurations against compliance frameworks.

In summary, ThreatKey takes a posture management approach while Wiz offers broader vulnerability assessment and remediation capabilities.

Comparing Business Models

There are key differences in the business models of ThreatKey and Wiz:

  • Pricing - ThreatKey charges per user and app. Wiz charges per asset monitored.
  • Funding - ThreatKey has raised $5 million. Wiz has raised $900 million.
  • Target Customers - ThreatKey serves all organization sizes. Wiz focuses on large enterprises.
  • Deployment - Both are cloud-based SaaS offerings.

In essence, ThreatKey is designed for broad accessibility while Wiz follows an enterprise sales approach. But both aim to expand their coverage.

Strengths of ThreatKey

Key ThreatKey strengths:

  • Unified platform secures SaaS apps and cloud infrastructure.
  • Intuitive interface enables fast time to value.
  • Accessible pricing suits organizations of all sizes.
  • Founders have strong cybersecurity expertise.

Weaknesses of ThreatKey

Potential ThreatKey weaknesses:

  • Less brand recognition as a younger company.
  • Lacks advanced remediation capabilities.
  • Reporting functionality could improve.

Strengths of Wiz

Key Wiz strengths:

  • Comprehensive vulnerability assessment capabilities.
  • Automated remediation workflows to fix issues quickly.
  • Centralized dashboard provides unified view of cloud risks.
  • Strong enterprise customer base and funding.

Weaknesses of Wiz

Potential Wiz weaknesses:

  • Complex setup requiring heavy consultant involvement.
  • Focused on large enterprises, with expensive pricing.
  • Mostly limited to Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) environments.
  • Less flexibility compared to ThreatKey.

Conclusion and Recommendations

In summary, ThreatKey delivers integrated SaaS and cloud security optimized for any organization, while Wiz offers robust but complex enterprise cloud vulnerability management.

For most organizations, ThreatKey represents the better choice with its unified platform, intuitive interface and affordable pricing. ThreatKey makes enterprise-grade security achievable for organizations of all sizes.

Larger companies with extensive cloud environments may require the advanced capabilities of Wiz if they can support the implementation complexity and costs.

It is recommended to trial both solutions when possible. But for most buyers, ThreatKey provides the best balance of security fundamentals, ease of use and accessibility. It stands out as a leader in integrated SaaS and cloud security for organizations of all sizes.

Demand more from your security platform


Reduction in Mean Time to Detect (MTTD)

The results and conclusions drawn from this data may not be universally applicable or representative of every individual case or scenario.


Faster scan completion when compared to leading CSPM and SSPM brands.


Supported integrations across SaaS and Cloud. Extensive integration support on every plan.
Streamline your approach to security posture management throughout your entire corporate environment.
Start Securing